However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

피고인은 2013. 1. 8. 21:00경 동두천시 K 소재 L 매장에서직원들의 관리가 소흘한 틈을 이용하여 진열되어 있던 피해자 M 소유의 쁘띠첼 오렌지 쥬스 2개(시가 7,500원), 모나미 네임펜 2개(시가 4,900원), 모나미 유성메직 2개(시가 3,600원), 오렌지 쥬스 1개(시가 6,800원), 매일 저지방우유 1개(시가 4,900원), 매일 유기농우유 1개(시가 4,800원) 등 합계 32,500원 상당의 물건을 자신의 점퍼 안쪽 주머니, 바지 주머니에 넣고 그대로 나왔다.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen another's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement of M;

1. A written statement of the N;

1. Receipt of stolen items and application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing evidence photographs;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act, in light of the fact that the damage is minor and that there is no particular criminal record except for the one-time suspension of sentence due to

1. Probation and community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;