However, each of the above defendants is against the defendants for one year from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. Defendant A is a person who is a spouse who has completed a marriage report with D on June 14, 1999. A.

On March 14, 2010, the Defendant had sexual intercourse with B at the guest room in which it is impossible to know the trade name in Daejeon Jung-gu, Daejeon.

B. On August 2010, the Defendant: (a) provided a woman’s room in which it is impossible to know the trade name in Daejeon Jung-gu, Daejeon; and (b) provided a sexual intercourse with B on one occasion at the guest room in which it is impossible for the Defendant to know the trade name

C. At around 17:00 on October 30, 2010, the Defendant sent sex B and once to a female guest room in which it is impossible to identify the trade name in Daejeon-gu E.

On November 13, 2010, around 14:45, the Defendant had sexual intercourse with B in a female room in which it is impossible to know the trade name in Jung-gu, Daejeon.

E. On April 30, 201, around 15:30 on April 30, 201, the Defendant had sexual intercourse with B in a female room in which it is impossible to identify the trade name in Daejeon Jung-gu, Daejeon.

F. On May 7, 2011, around 16:40 on May 7, 201, the Defendant had sexual intercourse with B in a female room in which it is impossible to identify the trade name in Daejeon Jung-gu, Daejeon.

G. On December 15, 201, around 21:15, the Defendant provided sexual intercourse with B and once at a female room where it is impossible to identify the trade name in Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu.

Accordingly, the defendant was sent to the above B more than seven times.

2. Defendant B knew that he was a spouse of the above A, and even at the same time, at the same place as that of each of paragraph 1, he was sexual intercourse with A seven times, respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. A complaint;

1. Marriage relation certificate:

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Defendant A of the pertinent Article of the Criminal Act concerning the crime: The first sentence of Article 241(1) of the Criminal Act: the second sentence of Article 241(1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Code for the suspended sentence are as follows: (a) the Defendants recognized each of the instant offenses; (b) Defendant B was the primary offender; and (c) the motive and motive of the Defendants’ crimes.