If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

1. On November 4, 2014, from around 10:50 to around 11:05 of the same day, the Defendant asserted that there was money to be received from D on the Epat horse operated by Kui-si Epat, Kui-si from around 10:50 to around 11:05 of the same day, the Defendant: (a) sought that he had the money to be received from D; (b) from the victim F, an employee, “Chewing fechis, within the city of fechis, and Ni-si do so; and (c) the Defendant continued to drive the victim who is avoiding the Defendant, thereby preventing customers from purchasing goods from his name fechis.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's emotional distress business by force.

2. The Defendant: (a) reported the victim H, a slope belonging to the G District District, which was dispatched upon receipt of a report at the date and time and place as stated in paragraph (1) and, without any particular reason, insultingly insulting the victim by openly insulting the victim by saying, “I have been fake, I have to refuse to do so, I have to see, and bar the victim.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to F and H;

1. Application of H’s Acts and subordinate statutes on the complaint;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act (within the scope of the sum of the maximum amount of the crimes above two crimes, which are determined by the crime of interference with business heavier than the punishment), among concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;