beta
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2020.05.21 2019나65045

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff is a person working as a swimming instructor in a swimming pool located in the C Training Center, and the defendant is a person who received a swimming course from the plaintiff in the above swimming pool.

B. On August 9, 2017, the Defendant posted a notice of the following content (hereinafter “instant notice”) on the civil petition bulletin board on the CTraining Center website (D) under the title “A: sexual harassment as a sexual harassment as a new wall acceptance instructor.”

The case was in the first class of the Tuesday on July 4 of the first day of the class.

It was confirmed that the instructor A in charge of Su Young-gu was able to apply for the conspiracy that appears next to the Su Young-gu Uniforms after explaining what the test line sees the body below the body in the explanation.

Children's pool is limited to the level of the lower bucks, which is below water and the rest of which is left above.

During the class, I confirmed that the place where the student is taking the class is a very strong assistant to the student.

There was no difference in how to cope with these days when they were first experienced, but a sense of shame was made, and the same day has been repeated once in July.

At the time, this kind of finites and finites were divided into finites, and the sexual harassment in the same way as August 8 was repeated once.

(m) First of all, I received a civil petition by posting a telephone to Seoul at the morning.

In addition, since sex crimes occur contingent, it is difficult to obtain evidence, and it is more detailed to make statements on the civil petition bulletin board.

(b) I will observe the A Instructor's statements that are revealed in future investigations.

In addition, in the future, whether A instructors will continue to take lessons at public institutions of Seoul Metropolitan Government, and if so, the students in this location shall be able to cope with any damage while paying tuition fees in the future.

C. The defendant of this case.