When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a second cargo vehicle in B.

On October 05, 2016, the Defendant driven the above vehicle on around 22:10, and proceeded with the intersection of the wall in front of the beginning of the west-gu, U.S., U.S., U.S. on the second side to be able to have the right to exercise the right to exercise the right to exercise the right to exercise the right to exercise the right to exercise the right to exercise the right to exercise the right to exercise the right.

Since this is a three-distance intersection, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to reduce the speed in advance and properly operate the steering and steering system, and to accurately operate the steering and steering system.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and neglected to leave the road, and received traffic safety fences and plastic houses owned by the victim C, which are installed at the front direction of the proceeding.

Ultimately, the Defendant did not take necessary measures, such as destroying and confirming the contents of the accident, etc. with a view to causing approximately KRW 2,880,000 at the repair cost of the traffic safety pents and plastic houses due to the above occupational negligence, and escaped without leaving the said cargo alone.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement of victim C;

1. Application of the report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and statutes governing field photographs;

1. Article 148 of the relevant Act and Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of fines concerning facts constituting an offense, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;