2. The Defendant’s act of obstructing and threatening the course of the victim’s driver’s vehicle by his own car is not good in that it is a dangerous act leading to a large traffic accident. However, the instant crime appears to have provided the cause of the victim’s intervening. In fact, the Defendant did not lead to a traffic accident; the Defendant did not have the same criminal power; the Defendant agreed with the victim; the Defendant’s mistake was divided; the Defendant committed the instant crime; the circumstances leading to the instant crime, including the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, method of crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., do not seem to be unreasonable in light of all the sentencing conditions indicated in the instant records.

3. According to the conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it is so decided as per Disposition.