When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On May 6, 2019, at around 16:49, the Defendant: (a) committed a theft with one credit card card of a national bank and one hundred thousand won in the market price, which had been set up at a place between the victim D’s axis and the victim D, on May 6, 2019.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report (in cases of substitution of photographs without seizing a cell phone which is a damaged object, such as CCTV image data investigation, etc. at the first generation site, etc.);

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act [Article 334(1) of the Provisional Payment Order (Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (Article 334(1) of the defendant alleged that the defendant was in a state of mental disability at the time of the crime in this case, but the defendant does not seem to have weak ability to discern things or make decisions at the time of the crime in this case. Thus, the above assertion by the defendant and his defense counsel does not accept) is committed the crime in this case during the period of repeated crime due to sentencing, since the degree of damage is not significant, most damage was recovered, the victim is not wanting punishment, and the defendant appears to have committed a confession and reflect against the crime, taking into account all the circumstances after the crime