beta
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2014.08.14 2013고단3331

부정수표단속법위반등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Of the facts charged in the instant case, Nos. 4, 5, and 10 of the [Attachment 1] list of crimes.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From April 4, 2001, the Defendant opened a comprehensive bank account with branch offices and household deposits and traded the coefficient table.

[2013 Height331] On April 30, 2013, the Defendant issued one check number in the name of the Defendant at D office located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Seoul, and one check number in the name of the Defendant, “E” and “five million won” as of the date of issuance, which is the date of issuance, and the check holder presented to the above bank within the period of payment proposal, but did not pay for the shortage of deposit. As shown in the separate sheet No. 1 through 3, 6 through 9, 11, and 12, the check number No. 2 in the separate sheet No. 1 of the crime sight table No. 2 is obvious to be the clerical error of “K”, and thus, the check number was corrected to “K”, and the check number No. 45 million won was issued within the period of payment proposal, but the check holder presented payment proposal within the period of payment, but was not paid as a deposit shortage or free transaction.

[2013 Highest 3721] around August 5, 2013, the Defendant issued one check number in the name of the Defendant at G office located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the check number “H”, the date of issuance “H”, and the face value “five million won” in the above bank’s household check, and issued one check on September 15, 2013 at which the holder of the check presented a payment proposal to the above bank on September 26, 2013, which was within the period of payment proposal, but did not receive a disposition of suspension of transaction. In addition, the Defendant issued 70,500,000 won and presented a payment proposal within the period of payment presentation as indicated in the attached crime No. 2 daily list, but did not receive a suspension of transaction.

[2013 Highest 3890] On June 30, 2013, the Defendant issued a check number I under the Defendant’s name, “I” on the date of issuance, “5 million won at par value” at D offices located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Seoul, and issued one copy of the above bank bank bank bank bank’s check, and the holder of the check presented payment to the above bank within the period of presentment for payment, but is not paid as non-transaction.