However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

The Defendant, at the Daegu-Gyeong District Military Manpower Administration, located in Daegu-gu Dong-dong on February 14, 2014, in 63, the same year.

3. Until 17., even though he received a written notice of enlistment of social service personnel in the name of the head of the Military Affairs Administration in the name of the Daegu-gu District Military Affairs Administration to enlistment as an association of 50 in the Daegu-gu District Office, Daegu-gu, and did not comply with the call without justifiable grounds until the 20th day of the same month after the date of the filing of the lawsuit.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. A written accusation and a written accusation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing receipt of enlistment notice;

1. Article 88 (1) 2 of the relevant Act on criminal facts;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act: The defendant has a criminal record of a fine of the same kind twice.

The favorable circumstances: There is no criminal history exceeding the fine against the defendant.

In addition, the sentencing conditions specified in the trial process of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive of crime, and circumstances after crime, shall be determined as ordered.