When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

피고인은 2017. 5. 경 ‘ 안내문’ 이라는 제목하에 “ 이 또라이 새끼는 P 사장을 강도들이 뻑 치기 하듯 뒤에서 갑자기 때려 전치 합 28 주가 나와서 이런 새끼와 D 그리고 공모하여 불법행위를 하였던 놈들도 모두 폭력, 폭력행위, 업무 방해, 영업 방해, 재물 손괴, 사기, 직업 안정법위반, 직업 안정법위반 방조 등으로 D( 협회 국장, 벌금 : 700,000), E(F, 벌금 : 3,000,000), G(H : 보스, 벌금 : 3,000,000), I( J, 벌금 : 700,000), C(K, 벌금 : 500,000), B( 벌 금 : 3,000,000) 벌금형을 받았습니다.

“Any person who has produced a 100 marbane in a printed paper (section 4 of A4) and then used a marbane marbane marbane in a printed paper.”

5. On the 23th day of the same month, around the 29th day of the same month, distribution was made to an unspecified number of singing rooms located in Busan-si, Jung-dong, Jung-dong, Song-dong, Songcheon-gun, Seocheon-gun, Seocheon-do, and Geum-dong.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the honor of the victim M, victim D, victim E, victim G, and victim I by openly pointing out facts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Police statements made in relation to M, D, E, C, and B;

1. Statement by the police concerning L;

1. Copy of a notice or summary order;

1. Each investigation report (victim G, C, L, B, I telephone communications);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a prosecution report (whether the content of the inducement is true);

1. Article 307 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order under Article 334(1) is committed by the accused for the same kind of crime, and there are records of criminal punishment several times, taking into account the circumstances favorable to the Defendant’s mistake, including the fact that the Defendant’s mistake is against himself/herself, and the fact that some victims agreed smoothly.