[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2 and 3, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination:

A. The Defendant asserts that the litigation procedure of this case should be interrupted until bankruptcy proceedings are completed pursuant to Article 424 of the Debtor Rehabilitation and Bankruptcy Act, since the Defendant filed an application for bankruptcy and exemption with the Busan District Court Decision 2019Hadan10398, 2019Hadle 2019, 10039, 20398.

However, there is no evidence to prove that the above bankruptcy and exemption case had been declared bankrupt in the above bankruptcy and exemption case, and the defendant's assertion is rejected.

B. According to the above findings of the determination on the merits, the junior administrative officer, etc. of this court shall grant the execution clause to the Plaintiff, who is the successor of the non-party C limited liability company, for compulsory execution against the Defendant, to the Seoul Western District Court 2014 Ghana 469569 case between the non-party C limited company and the Defendant.

3. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the ground that the plaintiff's claim is reasonable.