A. According to the purport of the evidence No. 1 and the entire pleadings, the Defendant, around January 20, 2012, may recognize the fact that the Defendant borrowed KRW 40,000 from the Plaintiff (hereinafter “the instant loan”) and the period of repayment as of January 20, 2013.

B. According to the above facts of determination, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff the remainder remaining after recognizing that the Plaintiff received reimbursement from the Defendant out of the instant loan and the amount calculated by 20% per annum from March 5, 2015 to the day following the delivery date of the original copy of the instant payment order.

2. Judgment on the defendant's assertion

A. The Defendant asserted that the Defendant repaid the Plaintiff KRW 18.66 million out of the instant loan funds.

B. The evidence No. 1 is merely a book prepared by the Defendant’s arbitrary discretion, and it is insufficient to recognize the Defendant’s assertion only by entering the evidence No. 1, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

3. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is justified.