A. The plaintiff runs the real estate brokerage business in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and the defendant runs the real estate brokerage business in Suwon-si, and both the plaintiff and the defendant operate the real estate brokerage business in Suwon-si, and their local licensed real estate agents as the main axis for the sharing of business affairs and friendship among the licensed real estate agents registered in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, which are established on March 6, 2009.

2) From November 28, 2011 to March 4, 2012, the Defendant posted comments, such as the attached list, on a total of 26 occasions in the instant car page, and around April 2012, the Defendant was accused of insult and was indicted against the Plaintiff. The first instance court rendered a judgment of innocence in the appellate court, and the appellate court rendered a judgment of conviction in the appellate court, which became final and conclusive on November 14, 2013.

[Grounds for recognition] Evidence A Nos. 1, 2, and 3, the court's significant facts, the purport of the whole pleadings

B. In full view of the purport of the argument in the above facts of the judgment, the Carbook held 540 members of Suwon-si, which is a car page with 540 licensed real estate agents belonging to Suwon-si, and both the Plaintiff and the Defendant were affiliated licensed real estate agents belonging to Suwon-si, and the Plaintiff sent F’s officers. The Defendant had critical awareness that FF members dismissed some licensed real estate agents and did not share the computer network, and used the same expressions as the attached list while making comments on the same purport. The Defendant’s expression method of the comments posted by the Defendant is “K”, “L,” “L,” and “M” as various sentences, and if the Plaintiff is aware of the fact that the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff was frequently in contact with the instant carbook, then the Plaintiff can be seen as the above expression of the Plaintiff.