When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On December 26, 2018, at around 23:10, the defendant, at around 26:23:10, the victim C (n, 37 years of age) in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju (hereinafter referred to as "the victim would have been suffering from mash," but he/she received the victim's demand to go together with the victim's words "I do not have to go so." but did not comply with the victim's demand to go further. On the same day, the defendant, at around 23:40 of the same day, he/she was sitting on the bed of the bed and brought to the victim until the police officer dispatched by the victim's report at around 23:40 of the same day, without justifiable grounds, such as the victim's withdrawal from the victim "

The Gu refused to comply with the Gu.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Part of the witness C’s legal statement;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel in the written statement C shall leave from the victim who had a franchis as a matter of leaving the victim and another woman under the condition that the defendant was in custody of his clothes;

Since the Gu received the Gu, it argues to the effect that there is a circumstance that can not immediately respond to the eviction and therefore the crime of non-compliance with the eviction is not established.

However, according to each of the above evidence, the defendant entered the above D around 23:10 on the day of this case, and the victim of sexual traffic stated in the above written statement that "the victim changed the victim's withdrawal from the post." The victim's defect that he could do so, the victim's refusal to comply with the defendant's request, and the demand that the victim go to the above business place, and the victim's escape.

In the absence of response to the Gu, the victim was brupted by the victim's desire to kill and die, and the victim reported to the police, and ③ the defendant did not leave the above place of business even before the police officer is dispatched at around 23:40 on the same day, and the police officer dispatched thereafter.

It is recognized that the defendant has not complied with it for a considerable time even after receiving the Gu, and the defendant is in the above business place.