2. In light of the judgment, although the crime of this case was conducted by installing two speculative gaming machines, the defendant was punished by a fine of one million won or more for the same kind of crime, the crime of this case requires strict punishment regardless of its size, such as promoting an excessive speculative spirit to the general public, etc. In addition, considering the defendant's age, character, character, intelligence and environment, motive, background, means, method, method and consequence of the crime of this case, and all of the sentencing conditions specified in the arguments of this case, including criminal records, etc., it is deemed that the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit, since it is not recognized that the sentence imposed by the court below is too excessive.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal of this case is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition.