However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On January 20, 2016, at the front of D main points in Ulsandong-gu, Ulsandong-gu, the Defendant: (a) d main points in front of the D main points in the foregoing main points to drink and walk the main points and walk the disturbance, and (b) 112 reported by the owner of the main points to avoid the disturbance; and (c) she expressed a bath to F police officers and police officers belonging to the Ulsan East East East Police Station Earb patrol 3 Team of the Ulsan-dong Police Station Ear-gu, Ulsan-do; (b) she was called “a Chewing fice” for returning home from G police officers and patrol officers; and (c) she was able to remove F’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’ h

G’s dubage was leeped beyond the floor, and the F was able to reflect the best distribution diversity, etc. requiring treatment for about 10 days, and the G was diversed about 5 diversity.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers in handling reports and maintaining order, and at the same time, injured the victims.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F and G;

1. A certificate of medical treatment and a medical certificate;

1. 112 A list of reported cases;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act under the suspended sentence is that the defendant interferes with the performance of official duties as stated in its reasoning and inflicts bodily injury on police officers in the process, and thus, the nature of the crime is not minor, but the defendant committed any contingent crime while under the influence of alcohol, and all other conditions of sentencing shall be determined as ordered in consideration of the degree of injury of the victims and all other conditions of sentencing.