beta
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2015.11.27 2015나54825

구상금

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal and the plaintiff's claim expanded in the trial are all dismissed.

2. After an appeal is filed.

Reasons

1. Basic facts and relevant statutes;

(a)The following facts shall not be disputed between the parties, or may be acknowledged pursuant to the purport of Gap evidence Nos. 1 to 4, 6, 7, and 11 and all pleadings:

1) On April 20, 201, the Defendant was not insured on April 20, 201, at around 08:40, 125cc VJF125 Oba (hereinafter “the instant Oba”), which was not insured on April 20, 201.

2) On the other hand, in accordance with Article 12(1) of the Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Act, the cross-section 3-lane 3-lane 4-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-3-2-2-2-2-2-3-2-2-3-2-3-2-3-2-2-3-2-3-2-3-2-3-2-3-4-2-3-4-2-3-4-2-3-4-2-3-4-2-3-4-4-2-3-4-4-2-3-4-2-3-4-4-

(2) Due to the instant accident, E, which was on the back of the instant Otoba, sustained an injury to the fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluoralsium 6,176,940 won (i.e., KRW 5,470, KRW 5,000, KRW 34,290, KRW 442,320, KRW 391,860). From May 30, 2011 to December 17, 2014, spent medical expenses (i.e., KRW 298,470).

3) The Plaintiff, as an insurance company, paid KRW 6,570,650, totaling KRW 6,570,650 from May 30, 201 to December 17, 2014 (i.e., medical expenses of KRW 6,176,940) to the Plaintiff on June 27, 201. (ii) The Defendant repaid KRW 5,298,470 to the Plaintiff on June 27, 2011.

The main contents of Article 3 are as follows. A person who operates an automobile for himself shall be different from the operation: