beta
(영문) 부산지방법원 2017.10.19 2017구합986

파면처분무효확인등

Text

1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On September 1, 1983, the Plaintiff was appointed as a philosophical and full-time lecturer at a humanistic University, and is a public educational official appointed as a professor on October 1, 1996 through an associate professor and associate professor.

B. On June 2015, the Plaintiff expressed that “D is a fake elected by the interruption of the morale of the electronic ballot counting machine.” On the other hand, the Plaintiff expressed that “Isn't have to use the judgment if Isn't have to use the judgment if Isn't have to take charge of the D electronic ballot counting machine fraud.”

C. On June 6, 2015, the Plaintiff, at the Plaintiff’s research institute located in B University, posted a notice “G” as the title “G”, by linking the Internet site F (F) to the Plaintiff’s “B University,” stating that the instant case was not listed by the students of B University, and that: (a) the following was determined: (b) the instant case was not listed in B University; (c) the Plaintiff’s pit, as soon as he belongs to the people and the Ethical thropos, along with I, D, belongs to the people; and (d) the organization of the crime was blocking the truth in all social fields, such as politics, media, education, administration, and legal profession, and thus, the economy is crashed and young, and the future of the young is obstructed.”

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant act,” in total, of the above remarks and the above publishing acts. D.

On June 8, 2015, the Korean National Assembly of B University announced a letter of name demanding the cancellation of the aforementioned Lart and the apology of students. On June 9, 2015, the Korean National Examination Committee received civil petitions related to the abuse of the Plaintiff’s teaching lectures and the infringement of the right of learning.

B University constituted a fact-finding committee and investigated the plaintiff's lectures.

E. On November 25, 2015, the Defendant requested the Disciplinary Committee on the General Education Officials of the National University (hereinafter “the instant Disciplinary Committee”) to take a heavy disciplinary measure against the Plaintiff, and the said Disciplinary Committee on January 22, 2016 against the Plaintiff.