마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
Defendant is not a narcotics handler.
1. Purchasing philophones;
A. On April 26, 2018, at around 23:00, the Defendant: (a) received two ghon-phones using a bank deposit account in the name of E designated by the deceased on April 27, 2018, after remitting KRW 1.2 million to the bank account in the name of E, which is designated by the deceased on his/her name, from “C” entertainment bars, through “D,” a smartphone-making-rating type, and from “D;” (b) around 12:57, 2018, the Defendant received two gon-lines by means of a high-speed bus transport in the name of E.
B. On June 10, 2018, the Defendant decided to purchase philopon from the person in the same manner as at the same place as at 23:00, and then remitted KRW 700,000 to the bank account in the above E’s name. On June 11, 2018, the Defendant received KRW 1g of philopon from G by means of high-speed bus freight at around 17:00.
In this respect, the Defendant purchased psychotropic drugs philophones over a total of twice as above.
2. Medication of phiphones.
A. On April 28, 2018, from around 14:00 to 18:00 on the same day, the Defendant administered the spopon, among the spopon htel I purchased as referred to in the above paragraph 1(a), in a way of burning it into coffee.
B. On June 24, 2018, from around 16:00 to 17:00 on the same day, the Defendant put the upper part of the phiphones purchased as set forth in J and K from June 24, 2018 into a single-use divers, and then injected the divers into the divers, dilution of raw water, and then directly injected them into the flaps.
C. On June 26, 2018, from around 16:00 to 17:00 on the same day, the Defendant, at the same place as the foregoing paragraph 2-B, puts the volume of fire into a single-use injection machine, among filterphones purchased as referred to in paragraph 1-b, and injected it directly into the embrogate after dilution by dilution.
Accordingly, the Defendant administered psychotropic drugs in a total of three times as above.
Summary of Evidence
1. The defendant;