However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On August 21, 2013, around July 12, 2013, the Defendant is engaged in the business of disposing of the victim D at a low price connected to the warehouse manager who stores and manages cash KRW 50,00,00,00,00,000, and the ownership of non-capital stock, which is the former owner, in the “C” point near the exit No. 11 in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government B basin No. 11, 2013.

If a sample, such as gold leader, is purchased in KRW 100 million and shows it to the preceding owner, and the former owner confirms the authenticity thereof, and the transaction with the owner, such as gold leader, is conducted, the profit of KRW 00 million shall accrue.

If the principal is lent KRW 100 million for the purchase of sampling, the principal will be returned within 2-3 days without conditions and be disred against profits.

“A false statement was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, at the time of fact, the defendant did not have any substance of the business and did not have any intent or ability to return the principal within the agreed time limit or distribute the profits even if he borrowed the money from the damaged person.

On August 21, 2013, the Defendant, as above, was delivered KRW 100 million as the loan money at a restaurant in which it is difficult to know the trade name in Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, Seoul.

3. On September 14, 2013, the Defendant of fraud, around September 14, 2013, may purchase samples and impose a larger amount on the victim demanding the return of the above KRW 100 million and the proceeds at a coffee shop where the trade name located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government is unknown at around September 14, 2013.

This is the end of this year.

Existing KRW 100 million guarantee.

“A false statement was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, at the time of fact, the defendant did not have any substance of the business and did not have any intent or ability to return the principal within the agreed time limit or distribute the profits even if he borrowed the money from the damaged person.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and received 40 million won as the loan from the injured party on the same day.

3. On November 24, 2014, the accused of the fraud shall be the accused of the fraud.