When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On January 28, 2014, at around 16:30, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the part of the course of the Defendant, which requires a treatment for approximately 28 days by plpling, plucking up, plucking up, plucking, cutting up, cutting up, and sticking towards the balone by pling the victim’s hand, on the ground that the victim D (here, 47 years of age) was unable to sit next to the Defendant’s inside and outside of Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Witnesses D and E's respective legal statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The Defendant’s defense counsel’s assertion as to the assertion of the defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act regarding the provisional payment order asserts that the crime of this case constitutes self-defense as a passive act against the victim’s unfair assault. However, in light of the background leading up to the fighting by the Defendant and the victim, the method and degree of the fighting, and the degree and degree of the injury, etc., the Defendant’s act of assaulting the victim at the same time is an act of defense, and thus, it is difficult to view that the Defendant’s act constitutes self-defense as a

Therefore, the defense counsel's above assertion is not accepted.