The punishment of the court below against the accused (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

In light of the following: (a) the Defendant’s mistake was divided; (b) the Defendant agreed with the victim; and (c) the Defendant led to the instant crime because his livelihood is difficult; (b) the Defendant had several criminal records; (c) the Defendant committed the instant crime within the same repeated period; and (d) the lower court’s punishment is close to the minimum punishment that has been mitigated; and (c) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, circumstances leading to the commission of the instant crime; and (d) all the sentencing conditions on the records and arguments of the instant case, including the circumstances after the commission of the crime

In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.