If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

At around 03:28 on April 11, 2020, the Defendant: (a) received a 112 telephone call report from Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, Seoul; (b) sent to the head of the E border belonging to the Seoul Shiro Police Station D District; and (c) received the instant E from the head of the E branch of the Seoul Shiro Police Station D District; and (d) taken a dog flick flick; (c) flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in regard to the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of CCTV images to a CCTV closure and video CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the order of provisional payment shall be returned from a police officer dispatched after receiving a report from 112 that the defendant has set away from his hotel seat; and

It is not good to commit a crime because it assaults a police officer upon request.

However, it is somewhat advantageous that the defendant has no record of punishment for the same kind of crime or a fine or heavier punishment, the defendant is fully aware of and reflects on the crime, and this case is somewhat favorable that the defendant drank alcohol due to the marriage problem of the second South in the course of his promise to give a hotel to the university of a hotel, and the defendant has been punished due to the lack of communication with the taxi driver, and some of the circumstances that can be considered in the course of the crime have been taken into account.

The punishment as ordered shall be determined in consideration of the sentencing conditions prescribed in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, motive and consequence of the crime, and circumstances after the crime.