2. We examine the judgment. The fact that the defendant plans not to drive under the influence of alcohol again by disposing of his/her confession and scraping his/her vehicle, and the fact that equity should be considered when a judgment is rendered at the same time in relation to the violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving under the judgment of the court below) and the latter concurrent crimes of Article 37 of the Criminal Act as stated in the judgment of the court below. However, the defendant was punished as a drunk driving on several occasions. In particular, the defendant needs to raise compliance awareness by stopping the crime of this case during the trial after being discovered as a drunk driving, and other conditions of sentencing under Article 51 of the Criminal Act, the court below's sentencing is acceptable in full view of the fact that the defendant is found to have been

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.