2. It is recognized that the judgment defendant repents his mistake.

However, the crime of this case is not very good; the defendant again committed the crime of this case even though he had been tried for the same kind of crime; the degree of injury suffered by the victim is not somewhat weak; the damage recovery or agreement has not been reached until the trial was rendered; the defendant's age, character and behavior and environment; the motive, means and consequence of the crime; and the conditions of sentencing specified in the arguments of this case, such as the circumstances after the crime, are considered, and thus, the defendant's above assertion is not reasonable. Thus, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.