The lower court upheld the first instance judgment that found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged as it is.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err in its judgment by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, by misapprehending the legal doctrine regarding a joint principal offender, or by submitting evidence that is inadmissible.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.