2. Although the defendant led to the confession of the crime of this case and reflects his mistake, the defendant again committed the crime of this case even though he had the record of punishment one time prior to the crime of this case, and the crime of this case includes not only the crime of philophone medication but also the crime of issuance of philophones, and in consideration of the fact that the crime of this case is very serious, and other circumstances, which are the conditions for sentencing as shown in the records and arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, and environment, it is not recognized that the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit.