beta
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2017.01.19 2016고정1106

공무집행방해등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A(48) is a company member, victim C(23) and D(20) are auxiliary police officers who work in the Seodaemun Police Station, and victim E(29) is a police officer belonging to the Seodaemun Police Station.

On April 10, 2016, the Defendant: (a) boarded at the back seat of G-si that he was boarding and arrived at the front door of the police station in Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul; (b) but did not occur under the influence of alcohol; (c) and (d) the Defendant, upon receiving a report from a taxi driver, sent to the site, paid KRW 15,000 for the boarding fee after shouldering the Defendant.

1. The Defendant, who was issued at the above place, time, warning, or taxi, said place and time of interference with the performance of official duties, stated that he would go back to the police officer E, and that police officer E return to the match.

3. The term “a person who goes home” and “a person who goes home,” and “a person who goes home,” and “a person who goes home.”

We tried to enter the Seodaemun Police Station with the sound of “I Dozra,” “I Dozra,” “Chewing gue,” and “I am fright,” and attempted to enter the same.

In the courtroom, it was assaulted by the above C and D, on the grounds that D and C were involved in the reason that they entered the police station into the police station, such as being pushed down on the chests of the above C and D.

Accordingly, it interfered with the legitimate performance of police officers' official duties.

2. In the case of insult 1. The date and place mentioned in the above 1. Paragraph (1) above, and the victim E, who listed the Defendant to return home to the police officer C and D around the police officer, the grade is changed to that of the victim E.

“I,” “I, I, or I, see that I, can be able to be able to be able to cope with.”

The victim publicly insultingd the victim by referring to “this fargue”, “Chewing fargue”, “farching”, and “Chewing fargue”.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness E, D and C;

1. Each police statement made to E, D, or C;

1. CDs (recording images) (the Defendant and his defense counsel have no record of insult.