However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 22:30 on April 1, 2015, the Defendant: (a) received a 112 report that the Defendant would not take the first race from the Kuju-si apartment; (b) received an inquiry about personal information, etc. from the D District Guard E of the Kuju Police Station, sent out; (c) took a bath that the Defendant could not put in his house under the influence of alcohol; and (d) took a breath of the said E’s bat; and (c) took her hand.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of a photographs of damaged parts;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on probation and community service order;

1. The scope of punishment by law: Imprisonment for not more than five years;

2. Application of the sentencing criteria;

(a) Determination of types: Crimes of obstruction of performance of official duties, obstruction of performance of official duties, and Category I;

(b) A special breeder: No person;

(c) Scope of recommendations: Basic area, six months to one year;

3. Determination of sentence: Six months of imprisonment with prison labor and one year of suspended sentence (including the fact that the defendant has a past record of violent crimes, but has no past record of suspended sentence or more, and that the defendant has not received a letter of suspicion of victimized police officers);