When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On June 18, 2018, at around 02:10 on June 18, 2018, the Defendant: (a) received 112 report related to the assault case from the stairs B 1st floor B in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu; and (b) received the explanation of the case from D and E during the time police officer of the Seoul Gangnam-gu Police Station C Police Station C, which called the Defendant’s speech threatening E to receive the Defendant’s assault case against the Defendant’s women’s day-to-day.

We set up from D, “Sweak Ik Ik Ik Ik Ik Ik Ik Ik Ik Ik Ik Ik Ik you view Ik Ik Ik wek Ik wek Ik wek wek wek youk youk youk youk youk youk youk youk youk youk youk youk youk youk youk youk youk

Accordingly, the Defendant assaulted police officers as above, thereby obstructing police officers from performing their legitimate duties in relation to the handling of 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Photographss and video CDs by capturing a video closure;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the standing photographs of the victims;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 40 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of a fine for negligence;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act include: (a) the Defendant’s deep reflects on the time when committing the instant crime; (b) the Defendant again does not commit such a crime; (c) there is no punishment so far; and (d) the Defendant has to maintain his workplace difficult for the Defendant; and (c) the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, motive for committing the instant crime, and circumstances after committing the instant crime are comprehensively considered and determined as ordered by the Criminal Procedure Act.