Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

1. Around 12:00 on July 21, 2015, the Defendant insultd the victim publicly insulting the victim by referring to a large voice of the victim, “The husband of the victim D does not compensate for the Defendant’s humfing,” which is the victim’s husband, at the end of every five days in Hongcheon-gun B, Hongcheon-gun, the five-day market, and that the victim D does not compensate for the Defendant’s humfing. However, while the victim’s humfing, the victim’s humf is the victim’s humf, who is living together in the same way as this humf, which is not the humf, the humf, the humf, the president of the G organization, and the passage of the customers, etc., and the same year is the same.”

2. On July 21, 2015, from around 12:00 to around 12:30, the Defendant interfered with business, the Defendant: (a) had the victim’s voice with the victim’s voice; (b) had the victim’s street in the above place; and (c) had the customer claimed the victim’s street standing, such as “the victim’s disturbance,” and “the victim’s voice, Masp. Masp. Masp. Masp. Masp. Masp. Mas. Masp. Ma

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D or F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing recording records;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;