beta
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2014.02.07 2013가합16450

채무부존재확인

Text

1. On September 1, 2009, the traffic accident involving C Freight motor vehicles in front of the front road B at the prompt beginning of the Seocho-si on September 1, 2009 due to the shocking of bicycles.

Reasons

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a federation established by freight trucking business operators, which is a corporation that guarantees liability for damages caused by car accidents by trucking business operators pursuant to Article 51(1) of the Trucking Transport Business Act.

The defendant is a man who is a student of DNA.

B. At around 16:53 September 1, 2009, E, who is employed by SP, Inc. (hereinafter “SP”), was driven by the “Treatment 25 metric tons Motor Vehicle” (hereinafter “instant cargo vehicle”), which is owned by SP, and was driven by a two-lane road in front of the commercial name “B” in the name of “B” located in the Sin Sinpo-dong at the Sinpo-si (hereinafter “instant cargo vehicle”), while driving the said vehicle on September 16:53, 2009.

However, since the act of driving of the bicycle at the time was moving down in the same direction as the freight of this case, E was passing through the above act while turning on emergency lights, and it was judged that the above act of driving was all past, and the vehicle of this case was driven toward the right-way shooting direction.

However, at the end of the above day, the Defendant, who was driving a bicycle at the end of the above day, was unable to leave the instant cargo, and in such a situation, E, at the wind where the right side of the said cargo is driven by the Defendant.

The defendant was running along with the bicycle due to the shock, and the part of the defendant's bridge and the bicycle were not connected with the wheels of the freight of this case, and they were subsumed to the right 3rd wheels below that of the freight of this case.

(hereinafter referred to as the above series of accidents are referred to as “instant accidents”). C.

The Defendant, due to the instant accident, has set the bones of the left her bones, the bones of her bones, and the bones of its bones, and left her bones.