2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

A. The plaintiffs are successors as the wife and children of the deceased G (H students, hereinafter “the deceased”).

The Defendant medical corporation is a legal entity that operates the Ulsansan Hospital located in the Nam-gu Seoul Metropolitan City (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant Hospital”), and Defendant E and F are doctors belonging to the Defendant hospital, who treated the deceased.

B. Around 07:50 on April 3, 2013, the deceased’s internal hospital and the deceased’s treatment process were called as “the Plaintiff’s clinic” and “the deceased’s clinic” and “the deceased’s emergency room at the Defendant hospital at around 07:57 on the same day.

At the time, the deceased was not at the risk of immediate death.

As a result of the X-ray examination on the deceased, the physician on duty in an emergency room inserts the above pipes after eating them through L-Bbebe (reviinbe and misconduct) around 09:55, and inserting them for the purpose of pressure by reducing gas, etc. from a disguised perspective in the case of a pulmonary mar patient.

Defendant F diagnosed the Deceased at around 12:07, and Defendant F and E inspected the workplace and the old imposcopy, which are distinguished from the internal progress of the register, subject to the entire ledger.

At around 13:20, the prosecutor ordered the deceased to take charge of the work, and the director of the Bangladesh taken charge of the deceased.

The Deceased lost consciousness around 13:25, and the Defendants took emergency measures such as cardiopulmonary resuscitation, etc., and the Defendant hospital could not provide artificial smoking treatments at the Defendant hospital, and transferred to the I Hospital at around 18:16.

The Deceased was treated at I Hospital and died on April 5, 2013 at around 04:40.

[Ground of recognition] Uncontentious facts, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 6, Eul evidence No. 1 (including numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), the result of the entrustment of the examination of medical records to the director of a high university hospital, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiffs' negligence color the deceased.