However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On July 6, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 12:40 on July 6, 2018, at the workplace of the “C” line D (52 tax) and the beer’s disease rearrangement work at the workplace of the Defendant’s worker D (52) and the beer’s disease rearrangement work; (b) ordered the Defendant to adjust the remaining beer’s disease; and (c) caused one beer’s disease, which is a dangerous object that was immediately adjacent to the Defendant, to cut off the number of the victims once and cut off, and 2-3 beer’s disease, where the head and body part of the victim was faced.

As a result, the Defendant used beer disease, which is a dangerous object, inflicted an injury on the victim, such as an open two weeks of treatment, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of D;

1. A medical certificate of injury submitted to the victim;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs by capturing CCTV images;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the conditions favorable to the following reasons for sentencing)

1. The scope of applicable sentences by law: Imprisonment for one year to ten years; and

2. Application of the sentencing guidelines [the types of decisions] violent crimes, special injuries and repeated crimes, and special injuries (type 1) (the scope of recommendations] - six months to two years (basic areas) by imprisonment.

3. In light of the fact that the nature of the crime is not good in light of the risk of the commission of the crime and the method of determining the sentence, the fact that the defendant was led to his confession, the defendant was not committed for the same kind of crime, the fact that the degree of injury was not exceeded the fine, and the fact that the degree of injury is relatively minor, etc., the punishment shall be determined as ordered by taking into account various circumstances, including the sentencing guidelines and the age of the defendant, sex behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., as set forth in the arguments of this case.