beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.09.09 2015가합10177

임대차보증금반환

Text

1. The Defendants jointly share the delivery of the Gangnam-gu Seoul D3 floors from the Plaintiff and 350,000.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On January 30, 2012, the Plaintiff entered into a real estate lease agreement (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”) with E, a representative of the Defendants, to lease three multi-family houses in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “instant building”) owned by the Defendants, with the lease deposit amount of KRW 350 million, and the lease term of KRW 350 million, from March 11, 2012 to March 10, 2015, the Plaintiff began to reside in the instant building after paying the lease deposit amount of KRW 350 million to E.

B. After that, on January 30, 2015, the Plaintiff notified E of the intent not to renew the lease after the expiration of the above lease term.

C. The Defendants did not refund the lease deposit to the Plaintiff after the expiration of the lease term.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 5, purport of the whole pleadings

2. The Plaintiff entered into the instant lease agreement with E, a representative of the Defendants, and paid KRW 350 million to E, a lease deposit. Since the lease agreement of this case was terminated on March 10, 2015, recognized earlier, the Defendants, a lessor of the instant building, have the duty to jointly return the said lease deposit to the Plaintiff at the same time as the delivery of the instant building, which is the object of lease, from the Plaintiff, as the lessee, at the same time.

3. If so, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.