Nevertheless, on April 20, 2015, the Defendant: (a) on April 20, 2015, while getting off a D cab in the vicinity of the Jinyang-si located in Busan, Busan, the Defendant left the cab without paying a charge to the cab at the end of the punishment; and (b) on the FJ G G in the 112 reported and dispatched after receiving the 112 report, the Defendant called the FJG G to pay the 22,080 won of the cab fee.

2. Determination

A. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the following facts can be acknowledged.

(1) On April 20, 2015, the Defendant, along with the workplace worker H, was boarding D-si operated by the E in front of the C in Busan Jin-gu, Busan at Busan at around 00:13, 2015.

The defendant was going to J in the vicinity of the defendant's dwelling through I apartment in Busan Shodong-gu, the dwelling area of H.

Shella Ha means that H will go to K.

The defendant was coming to I apartment as it is, and the defendant was coming to I apartment.

E has changed the destination in a uniform manner.

Fidelity E was able to carry a taxi in the vicinity of the Jinyang, which is an exclusive road for motor vehicles, and the Defendant and H were on the taxi.

At this time, the tax rate of 3,000 won was the taxi rate.

• The Defendant demanded the police officer dispatched after receiving the 112 report to conduct a provisional investigation according to the earth.

The defendant and H have taken a patrol car to F District, and went to F District.

E was in operation while driving a taxi to the F district, and the taxi fee was continuously in operation.

B. The Defendant asserts to the effect that, inasmuch as E requests for getting off a taxi in the middle of the road and gets out of the taxi, there are justifiable grounds for not paying taxi charges.

(c)

First of all, E leaves the Defendant.