beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2014.12.04 2013가단239671

손해배상(자)

Text

1. At around 15:30 on January 24, 2012, 201, BM5 vehicles and C.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. At around 15:30 on January 24, 2012, D, while driving a BM5 vehicle (Plaintiff vehicle) at a T-type T-type distance near the Goungung-gun, Goung-gun, Goung-gun, Goung-gun, and making a left-hand turn, D caused an accident of shocking the left side of the Defendant vehicle by negligence without discovering the CM5 vehicle (Defendant vehicle) of the Defendant’s driving who was directly located on the right side of the direction of the proceeding and without proceeding.

(The instant traffic accident). The Defendant suffered injury, such as dumpeds, tensions, etc. due to the instant traffic accident.

B. The Plaintiff is an insurer who entered into an automobile insurance contract on the Plaintiff’s vehicle listed in the separate sheet.

C. The defendant from January 31, 2012 to the same year

2. During the 22-day period from January 25, 2012 to November 30, 2013, the person was hospitalized in the Embrypt, and the person was hospitalized in the Embrypt, Fents, G Council members, etc. for 313 days during the period from November 25, 2012 to November 30, 2013.

The Plaintiff paid medical expenses of KRW 8,948,970 on the treatment content.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 9, the result of a physical examination entrusted to the president of the Korea University Hospital, the purport of the entire pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The summary of the party's assertion 1) The defendant suffered injury and needs an operation to treat the traffic accident of this case. As such, the defendant's treatment process after the operation should be calculated as accurate damages. 2) The plaintiff's negligence, such as the traffic accident of this case is very minor, the defendant's failure to wear a safety level, etc., the defendant has been negligent, such as 4-5, 4-5, 4-5, 5-6, and 8,970 won for the traffic accident of this case, and the plaintiff already paid medical fees. In full view of the following, there is no insurance money liability of the plaintiff against the defendant for the traffic accident of this case.

B. In a lawsuit seeking confirmation of existence of a monetary obligation, the Plaintiff, the obligor, first.