beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2018.02.23 2017고단1281

교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving freight B in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents;

On July 25, 2017, the Defendant driven the above cargo vehicle around 20:18, and proceeded one lane in two lanes before the D fishing point in Franpo City C from the right edge of the North port to the Newan apartment.

It was a road with a central line, so in such cases, a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle in a safe manner by accurately operating the steering and brake system.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and proceeded along without obtaining a driver’s license, and got the front part of the FF car in the victim E (V, 64 years old) driving, which was going on the opposite lane due to the negligence of breaking the central line, and received the front part of the FF car from the Defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the injury to the victim E in the above occupational negligence in light of the following: (a) the Defendant suffered, respectively, the injury to the victim G (the 63-year old-age-old) that requires approximately two-day medical treatment; (b) the Defendant suffered from the injury to the fluoral fluor, the fluoral fluoral fluoral base, the fluoral fluoral base, and the injury to the f2-year-old H (the 62-year-old) in need of approximately two-day medical treatment; and (c) the Defendant suffered from the injury of the fluoral f

2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed driving) driving of the freight vehicles listed in paragraph (1) without obtaining a driver’s license from the landing point of the line of the port located in the north-Si of Mapopopo-si to the site of the accident described in paragraph (1).

3. No motor vehicle which is not covered by mandatory insurance in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Insurance shall be operated on a road;

Nevertheless, the Defendant operated the cargo vehicles listed in Paragraph 1, which are not covered by mandatory insurance, as described in Paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's person;