However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Around 13:55 on September 13, 2015, the Defendant, while drinking alcohol in the 40-13 square of Pyeongtaek-si, Pyeongtaek-si, Li-si, the Defendant: (a) was locked in the vicinity of the Defendant; (b) caused the sound of the Defendant’s dispute with other people, the Defendant, thereby making the head of the victim, using the cryp as a dangerous object, and making the head of the victim, using the cryp with the cryp as a dangerous object, and thereby making the crypfing part of the victim’s left part of the cryp.

As a result, the defendant carried dangerous articles with the victim, thereby going to open the part of the unclaimed goods for treatment days, and damaged the victim's safety awareness equivalent to the market price of 380,000 won.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. C Legal statement;

1. C’s statement;

1. A certificate of fact of medical treatment;

1. Receipts:

1. Each photograph (the defendant and his defense counsel argued to the effect that the defendant did not intentionally destroy the safety of the defendant, but according to the evidence above, the defendant and his defense counsel's above assertion is not acceptable since the fact that the defendant intentionally damaged the security of the defendant. However, according to the above evidence, the defendant

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) (a point of special injury) of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of destroying or damaging selective property;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following favorable circumstances):

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act and Article 59 of the Act on the Observation, etc. of Protection, etc. of Social Service Order: The fact that there was a history of being punished by a fine due to violent crimes; this case is very dangerous for the defendant to have the head of the victim forcibly disembarked with beer disease, which is a dangerous object, to inflict an injury on the victim and damaged property; and at the time of the crime of this case, the defendant was committed.