However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 12, 2016, at around 04:10, the Defendant was arguing with female-friendly C in front of Seocho-gu Seoul, Seocho-gu, Seoul, for the reason that D, which came out from the door of the above C, was tightly hicking to listen to the situation of dispute between the Defendant and C, was being pushed down with D's chest and h with the floor of hand.

At the above temporary location, the Defendant: (a) committed an assault, such as the defect that the police officers belonging to the Seocho Police Station E division of the Defendant’s name and the F police box called the Defendant to arrest the Defendant as a flagrant offender in the crime of assault; (b) the police officers belonging to the Seocho Police Station E division of the Seocho Police Station assigned to G to the Defendant; and (c) the police officers assigned to the police station of the Seocho Police Station to resist the police officer, such as sing the police officer at a resistance to the police station; and (d) the police officers assigned to the police station of the police station of the police station of the Republic of Korea, not 10 to 20 seconds.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D or H;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Each photograph;

1. Investigation reports (to listen to the statements by police officers in charge of called for the scene) (to listen to the statements by police officers in charge of called for the scene), and the application of statutes

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The details and methods of obstructing the performance of official duties on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act, as well as the result thereof (the defendant's defendant's defendant's defendant's defendant's defendant's defendant's defendant's defendant's defendant's defendant's defendant's defendant's defendant's defendant's failure

However, the fact that the defendant repents the defendant's mistake in depth, deposit KRW 500,00 to the damaged police officer, the damaged police officer also wanting to leave the defendant's wife, and the defendant has the same or more punishment of imprisonment without prison labor.