However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. At around 03:30 on December 10, 2019, the Defendant insultd the victims by openly taking advantage of the victim E and the police box belonging to the Gwangju Police Station D police station, who are the circumstances where the Defendant was dispatched and prevented the Defendant from committing violence and confirming the circumstances of the case after receiving a report, in front of the Gwangju Building, on the street in front of the Gwangju Building, and by taking the victim F, who is a police officer of the Gwangju Police Station, “this rings, Chewing, and this rings,” and “the victim F, who is a police officer of the Gwangju Police Station.”

2. The obstruction of performance of official duties, the Defendant informed the Defendant of the following three principles: (a) at the time and time, at the time and place specified in the preceding paragraph, E and the victim F sent the Defendant a flagrant offender under the suspicion of assault, and (b) thereby obstructing the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties by assaulting the Defendant, and obstructing the victim F’s lawful treatment of the number of days and the left-hand hand of the victim’s knife, knife E with hand, pushed the victim’s body, pushed the victim’s knife with the victim’s knife with the victim’s knife with the victim’s knife with the victim’s knife, knife with the victim’s knife with the victim’s knife with the victim’s knife with the victim’s knife’s knife with the victim’s knife’s k.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and F;

1. Application of C’s written damaged photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is that the crime of obstructing the performance of official duties is a serious crime that undermines the function of the State by nullifying a legitimate exercise of public authority.

The defendant is performing official duties.