근로기준법위반등
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant, as the representative director of the “E” corporation established mainly for the construction design business in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (201), worked from June 1, 2015 to July 20, 2016, the Defendant did not pay KRW 13,642,183 in total from November 1, 2015 to July 2016 of the victim F, who retired from office, within 14 days from the date of retirement without any agreement on the extension of the payment date between the parties.
Judgment
Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act, Article 109 subparag. 2 of the Labor Standards Act, proviso to Article 44 of the Guarantee of Workers’ Retirement Benefits Act (the victim’s punishment is not imposed after the institution of the instant case)