Provided, That the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final.

At around 19:40 on October 5, 2014, the Defendant: (a) intruded the victim’s house with a deadly weapon, and then damaged the victim’s house by attaching one string door to the above house on the ground that the lessee does not leave the house; (b) one string door and two string door; (c) one string door and two string door; (d) one string door and five string door; (e) two string door of wooden materials; (e) six string door; (f) six strings; (f) one panty; (f) one string; (f) one string; (f) one string; (f) one string; (f) one string; (f) one string; and (f) one string door; and (f) one string door with a string door, one string door.

As a result, the Defendant invadedd the victim’s residence with a deadly weapon, and damaged the victim’s property worth KRW 2,485,000 in total market price by using the above hacker.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Photographs related to the case;

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc. of Specific Crimes; Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act; Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act; Article 366 of the Criminal Act;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (i.e., the fact that it is a confession and reflect, the fact that it has been smoothly agreed with the victim, etc.);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Discretionary Reasons for Discretionary Mitigation);