On January 1, 2015, at around 00:30 minutes, the Defendant, at a “D” restaurant located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on January 1, 2015, stated that, while drinking alcohol at a toilet, the Defendant was frightened, and that the above restaurant employees E “shall be frighted,” the Defendant expressed that he did not demand the victim F, who is the point of possession, to discharge garbage and pay the time expenses to the customers, but did not demand the victim F, who is the point of possession, and instead, interfere with the victim’s restaurant business by force by avoiding disturbances between approximately 20 minutes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Protocol of examination of the witnessF;

1. Application of CCTV-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Penalty fine of KRW 1,000,000 to be suspended;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the inducement of a workhouse;

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (The first offender is the defendant, the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant, and the conditions of sentencing specified in Article 51 of the Criminal Act shall be taken into account);