However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Around September 14, 2019, the Defendant assaulted the victim on the ground that the Defendant’s home located in the Defendant’s home located in Ansan-si Member B, Ansan-si, on the ground that C (34 years of age) who is his/her his/her father’s father did not distort a boomed boom.

2. 특수협박 피고인은 제1항 기재 일시장소에서, 제1항 기재와 같이 피해자 C을 넘어뜨린 후 부엌으로 가 식탁의자를 집어 들어 “개노무새끼 죽여버린다, 집을 다 불태워버릴거니까 다 꼴뵈기 싫으니까 집에 오지도 말아라”라고 말하고, 이어 위험한 물건인 식칼을 들고 와 다시 “이놈의 새끼 죽여버린다”라고 말하고 위 식칼을 바닥에 던져 피해자를 협박하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police protocol law to C

1. Relevant Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, Articles 284 and 283(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for a crime, the choice of imprisonment for a crime, the choice of punishment for a crime

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. On the grounds of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act, the sentencing conditions indicated in the records, such as the following circumstances and Defendant’s age, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., shall be determined as ordered in consideration of the sentencing conditions indicated in the records.

The crime of this case is committed by the defendant with a knife and threatening a victim who is his/her father, and the nature of the crime is not good, and the circumstances favorable to the fact that he/she was unable to get used from the victim: The defendant's mistake is recognized, and the defendant has no criminal records.