However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(e).

around 16:00 on October 15, 2007, the Defendant called the Victim’s Handphone and called the Victim’s Handphone, “if there has been any defect in the front part of the vehicle, and why it has been tightly enclosed;

This also has been reported and not reported.

"............ the reason why the vehicle is brought to the mast of the mast," from the injured person

For the reason that the word "" was written, D. B. L. L. L. as it is in the width house:

It is said that the inside of the Republic of Korea is the death of a party.

As a result, the Defendant threatened the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the Act on the Legal Statement of Witness B

1. Relevant Article 283 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act

1. On April 2017, the Defendant: (a) received a request from the victim B, who is the birthee, to lend the name of the purchase of the rocketing vehicles from the victim B; and (b) received a request from the victim; (c) however, he was aware that the victim’s children had the said vehicle in the name of the Defendant and received the said vehicle.

On October 9, 2017, the Defendant: (a) called the victim to call and call the above vehicle; (b) however, as the Defendant was refused, she saw the victim to “I would leave the vehicle without knowing the vehicle; (c) was frightened by having the victim’s house located in the front of the victim’s house located in the Southern-gun, Dan-gun, with the victim’s market price equivalent to KRW 14 million from the victim’s vehicle located in the front of the victim’s house located in the Southern-gun, Dan-gun.

2. Comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances based on the results of examination of evidence, the evidence alone presented by the prosecutor is insufficient to recognize this part of the facts charged.

① Although the Defendant made a confession from an investigative agency to the court, the Defendant consistently denied the facts charged of intimidation.

(2) The injured party shall receive a telephone from the accused while he was responsible for her fluoral and piracy, and the accused shall make a fire by telephone as mentioned above.