The defendant.

A. The status of the parties is that the Plaintiff is a company engaged in a special co-rating manufacturing business, etc., and the Defendant is a company engaged in gold-making and design business.

B. On April 2014, the Plaintiff and the Defendant provided HG 15MY FOB KEY products from the Defendant, and carried out the crating of the said products (hereinafter “instant crating products”).

3) The contract to supply to the Defendant (hereinafter “instant contract”)

A) Around May 2014, the Defendant entered into a contract with the Defendant to supply the instant hosting products. The Defendant is the e-mail Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “e-mail”).

2) The instant co-rating product is an external form of a trillock clock, which is used on a motor vehicle, divided into three trawlocks and four trawlocks, and three trawlocks are classified into three trawlocks and four trawltains depending on the number of trawltains, and three trawlocks are comprised of three trawl UPPPPPPERS CAS CAS (3/4 BUS) and three bUTONN (LOCK, UNLOCK, PNIC, and 4 BUTNK).

According to the statements in Gap evidence Nos. 10, 12, 13, and 14, the quantity supplied by the plaintiff to the defendant as the aggregate of the unit price for the classification of model name products is recognized, the quantity supplied by the plaintiff to the defendant shall be 00,191, 364,658, B/T UNCIK (4B/T) 367,121, B/TTRCK (4B/T), and 367,121, B/TN (4B/T) (4B/T) 368,184, and 367,121, B/TUK (4B/T) 368,184, and 364 of the plaintiff's assertion that the plaintiff supplied the defendant more than the defendant.

(Opening) HG 15MY FOB K/T 4 B/T 4206,871 LOW 406,871 LOW CAS3/4 officially 485,978 B/T 4 B/T 245,379 B/T 4 B/T 2459,892 B/T 4 B/T 2459,892 B/T 4 B/T 2452,368 B/T 4 B/T 4 B/T 2452,368 B/T 4 B/T 4 B/T 2455 363,60 UPPP 3 B/T 3 B/T 520,870 B/T 3/T 245 B/T 3/245, B/53/522,253/243/52,254,2543/2733/243 of T.