2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. The relationship between the parties and the children between Defendant H, G, and Nonparty J, K, L, and M are those between the network N and the networkO; Defendant B is the wife of J; Defendant C is the wife of J; Defendant C is the wife of J; Defendant D is the grandchildren of Defendant C’s children (outstanding of J), Defendant E, and F.

B. (1) On January 8, 1957, J specified Priland as “Priuri” inasmuch as the location of real estate is the same as that of the Pririri from the net N before subdivision (hereinafter “Priri”).

(2) On April 9, 1957, the forest of this case was divided into several parcels, including each real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “R land”) around 2012, where Q2,062 square meters (hereinafter “the forest of this case”) were donated and completed the registration of ownership transfer.

C. 1) In the early 1980s, J borrowed interest from U.S. on the registration certificate of the right to the forest of this case from 20% per annum to U.S. on the basis of the early 1980s, and the principal and interest of KJ reached 301 Gama on February 14, 1985. From February 14, 1985, J concluded the sale contract of this case by dividing the Plaintiff, K, and the Plaintiff and K with 301 Gama around December 30, 1987 into the sale contract of this case with 100 U.S. on the basis of 198 Gama, 10,000 (hereinafter “the sale contract of this case”) around 18, 198 Gamama and 198 Gama were paid to the Plaintiffs on December 30, 1987.

The plaintiff and K are entitled to make a provisional disposition and to make a statement of the provisional disposition.