When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. Around 00:30 on August 12, 2015, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s business by force, such as: (a) having arrived at the destination of the victim D (41) on the street in front of the Gangnam-gu Seoul building; (b) refusing to pay taxi expenses without any particular reason while drunking; and (c) having the victim expressed a bath by “the victim who drinks it; (d) having sees it; and (e) having see knife, knife, knife, knife, and knife knife, knife”; and (d) having interfered with the victim’s business by force.

2. The Defendant, who was dispatched to the scene after having received 112 reports, shall equally engage in the duties of insulting the victim G (42 Does) of the said taxi driver and salivists, who were dispatched to the scene.

It is necessary to destroy sacracks.

In this regard, the victims were openly insulting, and the victim was insulting.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness G;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;