(a) Defendant B and C 1,071 shares, respectively, 14,99;

B. Defendant D and G are each 14.0

In full view of the overall purport of the statements and arguments in the evidence Nos. 1 and 208(3)2 and Article 150(3) of the Civil Procedure Act of the applicable provisions of the law, as to the claim against Defendant E and J, the pertinent real estate was subject to registration of ownership transfer in the name of R, but the registration of ownership transfer was made in the name of Defendant J on August 26, 1986. On March 21, 1988, the pertinent real estate was subject to registration of ownership transfer in the name of R, E, and F on July 31, 191, upon the death of Defendant D, E, and F inherited the deceased’s share in the deceased’s name; R died on July 10, 197 and the spouse of R and his children, C, C, U.J, U. 2, U. 2, 207, and Q2, the heir and children of the instant real estate, and the inheritance and inheritance of the heir of the Plaintiff C and Q2, 30.7.

The Plaintiff asserted to the effect that the Defendants, who inherited the net R’s shares, should implement the procedure for ownership transfer registration based on the gift made on April 1, 1988, according to their own shares of inheritance, on the grounds that the Plaintiff received 1/2 shares of the instant real estate from the deceased R on April 1, 1988.

However, under the circumstances where there is no disposal document that the deceased R donated 1/2 of the instant real estate to the Plaintiff, it is insufficient to recognize that the deceased R donated 1/2 of the instant real estate to the Plaintiff only with the statement of Defendant C in a penal relationship with the Plaintiff, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this otherwise.

The Plaintiff’s respective claims against Defendant E and J based on the premise that the deceased R donated 1/2 of the instant real estate to the Plaintiff is dismissed as it is not acceptable. It is so decided as per Disposition.